The Subjectivity of Feel and Timing

There’s no doubt that feel and timing are the fundamentals of good horsemanship and there are few horse trainers who don’t emphasise their importance. Whatever your discipline or chosen training method, developing a good feel and accurate timing are sure to be the keys to your success, and you can’t have one without the other. Being able to read your horse is useless without having the skill to co-ordinate your aids at the correct moment; on the other hand, what use is good timing if you don’t know when or why to ask, resist, or release?

What few trainers talk about is how subjective ‘feel’ can be. Timing is simple if you are looking only for a physical change – for your horse to take a step back, put his foot on a pedestal, or move up a gait. But what about when the thing you are looking for is more than just physical? What about when you are looking for your horse to soften mentally, rather than physically; to not just perform a movement, but to perform it with energy, calmness, or fluidity; when you want to affect a change in your horse’s thoughts, not just their physicality?

Timing your release or reward can only be accurate if you can define exactly what is is you are looking for. Do you want your horse to just take a step back or do you want your horse to want to take a step back? Are you looking for your horse to back up in a way that is biomechanically correct or simply yield their space? Are you searching for softness in the mind, lightness to the aids, or expression of movement? A good trainer should be able to explain exactly what they are looking for and be able to relay this to their horse. And before you assume somebody else’s timing was wrong, be sure you know what it was they were looking for in the first place.

I had a situation recently when my instructor was getting frustrated with my apparent lack of feel and timing. He kept repeating the same corrections without ever seeing the results that he wanted. For my part, I felt it was improving and was becoming increasingly frustrated that he wasn’t seeing what I was feeling. In exasperation, I asked him to ride my horse, hoping it would help clarify where I was going ‘wrong’. It did, but not quite in the way I had hoped. I realised that I wasn’t feeling what he wanted me to feel. I was searching for a different answer. I was searching for mental softness, an understanding of the aids, a sense of willing cooperation from my horse. He was looking for the horse to lower its head, to round its back, to champ at the bit. He seemed completely oblivious to the fact that in doing so, she was now more resistant than ever, ears pinned, tail swishing, her nose pulled in so tightly towards her chest that I could see her veins bulging.

Needless to say, he didn’t stay my instructor for much longer after that, but this isn’t a blog about questionable training methods. Because while I disagreed completely with his approach, the truth is that his feel and timing were spot on – we just weren’t looking for the same thing.

For me, when I ride my horse with a contact, I imagine the reins like a fine string connecting our thoughts. Resistance in the horse’s mind feels like he is gnawing away at the string, trying to cut the connection – this feels wrong to me, even if the horse is moving in a desirable way (I also don’t believe it is possible for a horse to carry tension in their mind without carrying it through their body too). Willingness feels like the string is flowing through to his hooves, like his entire body is at my fingertips. And at this early stage of training, or re-training, this feeling might be fleeting, momentary, invisible to the untrained eye. This is what I was searching for and in my opinion, my timing was spot on too. My instructor was simply looking for a physical change and there was no doubt that his methods brought about a physical response in the horse that was instant and immediately noticeable. So who was right?

It made me think about the documentary ‘Classical Versus Classique’ in which Philippe Karl of the French School of Légèreté and Christoph Hess, head of the German National Equestrian Federation (FN), meet to compare their different training methods. Both are incredibly accomplished in their individual fields, both train horses to the highest levels of dressage, but yet each trainer is in complete disagreement about how to achieve the end goal and what that end goal should be. Never have I seen a more complete demonstration of how subjective feel can be.

But the question is: if feel is so subjective, how can we possibly learn it?

My advice is to break it down into the different elements of feel. When you are riding or working with your horses, consider all these different elements; stay open and try to listen to your horse; follow your instincts and explore the places where they lead you.

Learn to feel the physical through practice – which diagonal you are rising on, which canter lead your horse has picked up, whether you are sitting straight, whether your horse has enough impulsion to perform a movement, how many strides before a jump, etc. This is step one.

Step two is trying to feel how the horse is responding mentally and this is much more difficult to quantify or teach. Can you feel when your horse is tense, when he is thinking about spooking, when he is fully concentrated on you or preoccupied by something else? Can you feel the difference between resistance and softness in your horse’s mind; when your horse is thinking forward instead of just responding to your aids and moving his feet?

The final stage of feel transcends all of this. It’s the difference between those moments when I feel my horse will do whatever I want him to do, and the moments when my horse is so connected and in sync with me that he seems to want to do whatever I have in my mind. Can you get to a point with your horse where your thoughts become theirs? Where you can feel what response you will get before you ask and can adjust your ask accordingly? Can you feel the intangible connection that exists in a true partnership? For me, that is the ultimate achievement of feel and timing. And the best thing about it is that at this stage there is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ – it simply is whatever you feel it is, and it doesn’t matter one bit what anyone else sees or thinks.


Photo courtesy of Saparevo via Flickr.


One thought on “The Subjectivity of Feel and Timing

  1. Buck Brannaman explained this unexplainable, almost mystical transcendence of feel so well. but I can’t remember how he did it… It is at the end of his long documentary series, 7 clinics. It really made those vidoes worth watching and rewatching, since I felt that here was someone who had that same goal with equines, but which I had never been able to explain, only glimpse a little in my life (sigh…)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s